Example output
Taste DNA
Based on the interests you provided, modelled cultural affinity connects your declared taste — Marlowe Vance, Kickflip Boulevard, and Sable Court — to Music artists and Films. The headline names only the descriptors traceable to what you confirmed; the rest of the list below is related ground reached through the catalogue's expansion of it. This is a modelled taste signal derived from those inputs, not a measurement of your audience.
You selected 3 interests: Marlowe Vance, Kickflip Boulevard, and Sable Court.
7 further affinities were discovered from those inputs, including DJ Hollowfield, Velvet Static, and Ferrous Bloom.
What you declared, what was discovered around it, and how the two connect.
MethodEvery affinity is normalised within the result set it came from, because the data source normalises per query and depresses scores as filters are added. Scores from different calls are never compared directly. An interest you confirmed yourself is the one exception: it carries full weight and was never ranked against anything, so it is labelled as confirmed rather than described as a score. Taste tags are derived by us: for each tag, we sum the within-set normalised affinity of every result carrying it, then divide by the total across all tags. A tag must appear on at least two results to be shown.
Layout is deterministic: ring by node kind, angle by sorted weight. Node size is weight within this network; it is not a count and not a share of an audience.
MethodEvery affinity is normalised within the result set it came from, because the data source normalises per query and depresses scores as filters are added. Scores from different calls are never compared directly. An interest you confirmed yourself is the one exception: it carries full weight and was never ranked against anything, so it is labelled as confirmed rather than described as a score. Taste tags are derived by us: for each tag, we sum the within-set normalised affinity of every result carrying it, then divide by the total across all tags. A tag must appear on at least two results to be shown.
Unexpected affinity
The cultural territories this profile is closest to, strongest first.
MethodEvery affinity is normalised within the result set it came from, because the data source normalises per query and depresses scores as filters are added. Scores from different calls are never compared directly. An interest you confirmed yourself is the one exception: it carries full weight and was never ranked against anything, so it is labelled as confirmed rather than described as a score. Ranking covers 10 of 10 results, 3 of them confirmed by you.
Scores are normalised within this ranking of 10 results (min–max over returned affinity). They describe cultural proximity, not a share of any audience.
The word at the right of each row is how that row surfaced: confirmed means you picked it yourself, cross-category means it was reached into a category none of your confirmed interests sit in, traced means it was reached from your interests inside ground you already work in, and our read means no explanation arrived for it and its position rests on the aggregate score alone.
MethodEvery affinity is normalised within the result set it came from, because the data source normalises per query and depresses scores as filters are added. Scores from different calls are never compared directly. An interest you confirmed yourself is the one exception: it carries full weight and was never ranked against anything, so it is labelled as confirmed rather than described as a score. Ranking covers 10 of 10 results, 3 of them confirmed by you.
Untapped cultural connections
The widest gap is Music artists — clear affinity against declared coverage of 0%.
Cultural affinity against the coverage you declared, by category.
MethodOpportunity gap is cultural affinity multiplied by the uncovered share of that category. Coverage comes from what you declared; it is never measured from your content.
Coverage basis: At least one plotted category had no coverage statement from you, so it is treated as uncovered. That zero is our inference, not something you declared, and points marked accordingly should be read as assumptions.
UntappedStrong affinity, little existing coverage. The gap worth looking at first.
Gap score0.65on a 0–1 scale
Music artists: clear cultural affinity, and you have not declared any coverage. Gap score 0.65 on a 0–1 scale. Coverage is self-reported by you, not measured from your content.
Based on 6 entities in this category.
SpeculativeLittle coverage and modest affinity. Unproven in both directions.
Gap score0.51on a 0–1 scale
Films: moderate cultural affinity, and you have not declared any coverage. Gap score 0.51 on a 0–1 scale. Coverage is self-reported by you, not measured from your content.
Based on 4 entities in this category.
MethodOpportunity gap is cultural affinity multiplied by the uncovered share of that category. Coverage comes from what you declared; it is never measured from your content.
Brands where your taste overlaps
The chain from what you make, through the culture you are close to, to a brand.
MethodBrand fit is a weighted combination of up to five dimensions at 45/20/15/10/10. A dimension with no data is excluded and the remaining weights are renormalised — it is never given a default value. Chains show interest → cultural affinity → brand; each link states whether the number came from the data source's explainability or from our own matching.
Sustainability-led outdoor apparel. Curator action required before any route is rendered.
Registry noteSustainability-led outdoor apparel. Curator action required before any route is rendered.
No website or profile URL came back with this brand, so none is linked. CreatorsDNA does not construct a URL from a brand name.
Clear shared tasteCreatorsDNA
1 descriptor matched exactly between the two profiles, inside the tag namespaces they share (urn:tag:genre:media, urn:tag:style:qloo).
Limited alignment · 4 of 5 dimensions
29 of 100 is a weighted blend of 4 of 5 dimensions — taste fit, audience fit, content compatibility, and opportunity gap. Each one is a measurement in its own right and carries the basis sentence shown beside it: the cultural ones count descriptors the catalogue returned for this brand, not where it sat in a list of candidates. It is not a percentage of any audience, not a likelihood of a deal, and not comparable to a score from another analysis. The other 1 had no evidence and were left out rather than scored at zero, so the weights of the rest were renormalised to sum to 1.
A hypothesis to test, not a deal: your taste and Patagonia's overlap around Hip-Hop, which may make them worth exploring for a collaboration that feels native to the content you already make. Nothing here says Patagonia runs a creator programme, is looking for partners, or would respond.
Could not be judged: Your strongest cultural ground — Music, Film and Retro — found no counterpart in what the catalogue returned for this brand. That is a gap in the data held about the brand, not a finding that the brand has nothing to do with it.; Geographic fit — Exact country match between your declared location and the region the data source returned for this brand..
Cultural relevance is not commercial intent. A strong figure means Patagonia sits near your taste in the catalogue this data came from — it does not mean they sponsor creators, that a campaign exists, or that an introduction would land.
1 of 5 dimensions could not be computed and were excluded rather than assumed. The remaining weights were renormalised so the total still sums to 1 — they were not padded with a neutral value.
This is a partial assessment. 4 of 5 dimensions contributed, covering 90% of the intended weighting; the rest were renormalised into the ones that did. The figure is arithmetically correct over the available dimensions, but it is not a full assessment and should not be read as one.
Computed from 4 of 5 dimensions, covering 90% of the nominal weighting. Geographic fit was excluded because the data was not available — not set to a default.
No verified partnership route is on file for Patagonia. CreatorsDNA does not guess at contact details, and no route on file says nothing about whether one exists — only that we could not check it. If you pitch, you will be finding the contact yourself.
Workwear-origin streetwear label. Curator action required.
Registry noteWorkwear-origin streetwear label. Curator action required.
No website or profile URL came back with this brand, so none is linked. CreatorsDNA does not construct a URL from a brand name.
Clear shared tasteCreatorsDNA
1 descriptor matched exactly between the two profiles, inside the tag namespaces they share (urn:tag:genre:media, urn:tag:style:qloo).
Limited alignment · 4 of 5 dimensions
29 of 100 is a weighted blend of 4 of 5 dimensions — taste fit, audience fit, content compatibility, and opportunity gap. Each one is a measurement in its own right and carries the basis sentence shown beside it: the cultural ones count descriptors the catalogue returned for this brand, not where it sat in a list of candidates. It is not a percentage of any audience, not a likelihood of a deal, and not comparable to a score from another analysis. The other 1 had no evidence and were left out rather than scored at zero, so the weights of the rest were renormalised to sum to 1.
A hypothesis to test, not a deal: your taste and Carhartt WIP's overlap around Hip-Hop, which may make them worth exploring for a collaboration that feels native to the content you already make. Nothing here says Carhartt WIP runs a creator programme, is looking for partners, or would respond.
Could not be judged: Your strongest cultural ground — Music, Film and Retro — found no counterpart in what the catalogue returned for this brand. That is a gap in the data held about the brand, not a finding that the brand has nothing to do with it.; Geographic fit — Exact country match between your declared location and the region the data source returned for this brand..
Cultural relevance is not commercial intent. A strong figure means Carhartt WIP sits near your taste in the catalogue this data came from — it does not mean they sponsor creators, that a campaign exists, or that an introduction would land.
1 of 5 dimensions could not be computed and were excluded rather than assumed. The remaining weights were renormalised so the total still sums to 1 — they were not padded with a neutral value.
This is a partial assessment. 4 of 5 dimensions contributed, covering 90% of the intended weighting; the rest were renormalised into the ones that did. The figure is arithmetically correct over the available dimensions, but it is not a full assessment and should not be read as one.
Computed from 4 of 5 dimensions, covering 90% of the nominal weighting. Geographic fit was excluded because the data was not available — not set to a default.
No verified partnership route is on file for Carhartt WIP. CreatorsDNA does not guess at contact details, and no route on file says nothing about whether one exists — only that we could not check it. If you pitch, you will be finding the contact yourself.
Curator action required: verify the official ambassador programme URL.
Registry noteCurator action required: verify the official ambassador programme URL.
No website or profile URL came back with this brand, so none is linked. CreatorsDNA does not construct a URL from a brand name.
Clear shared tasteCreatorsDNA
1 descriptor matched exactly between the two profiles, inside the tag namespaces they share (urn:tag:genre:media, urn:tag:style:qloo).
Limited alignment · 4 of 5 dimensions
29 of 100 is a weighted blend of 4 of 5 dimensions — taste fit, audience fit, content compatibility, and opportunity gap. Each one is a measurement in its own right and carries the basis sentence shown beside it: the cultural ones count descriptors the catalogue returned for this brand, not where it sat in a list of candidates. It is not a percentage of any audience, not a likelihood of a deal, and not comparable to a score from another analysis. The other 1 had no evidence and were left out rather than scored at zero, so the weights of the rest were renormalised to sum to 1.
A hypothesis to test, not a deal: your taste and Lululemon's overlap around Hip-Hop, which may make them worth exploring for a collaboration that feels native to the content you already make. Nothing here says Lululemon runs a creator programme, is looking for partners, or would respond.
Could not be judged: Your strongest cultural ground — Music, Film and Retro — found no counterpart in what the catalogue returned for this brand. That is a gap in the data held about the brand, not a finding that the brand has nothing to do with it.; Geographic fit — Exact country match between your declared location and the region the data source returned for this brand..
Cultural relevance is not commercial intent. A strong figure means Lululemon sits near your taste in the catalogue this data came from — it does not mean they sponsor creators, that a campaign exists, or that an introduction would land.
1 of 5 dimensions could not be computed and were excluded rather than assumed. The remaining weights were renormalised so the total still sums to 1 — they were not padded with a neutral value.
This is a partial assessment. 4 of 5 dimensions contributed, covering 90% of the intended weighting; the rest were renormalised into the ones that did. The figure is arithmetically correct over the available dimensions, but it is not a full assessment and should not be read as one.
Computed from 4 of 5 dimensions, covering 90% of the nominal weighting. Geographic fit was excluded because the data was not available — not set to a default.
No verified partnership route is on file for Lululemon. CreatorsDNA does not guess at contact details, and no route on file says nothing about whether one exists — only that we could not check it. If you pitch, you will be finding the contact yourself.
Curator action required: verify the official creator programme URL.
Registry noteCurator action required: verify the official creator programme URL.
No website or profile URL came back with this brand, so none is linked. CreatorsDNA does not construct a URL from a brand name.
Clear shared tasteCreatorsDNA
1 descriptor matched exactly between the two profiles, inside the tag namespace they share (urn:tag:genre:media).
Limited alignment · 4 of 5 dimensions
29 of 100 is a weighted blend of 4 of 5 dimensions — taste fit, audience fit, content compatibility, and opportunity gap. Each one is a measurement in its own right and carries the basis sentence shown beside it: the cultural ones count descriptors the catalogue returned for this brand, not where it sat in a list of candidates. It is not a percentage of any audience, not a likelihood of a deal, and not comparable to a score from another analysis. The other 1 had no evidence and were left out rather than scored at zero, so the weights of the rest were renormalised to sum to 1.
A hypothesis to test, not a deal: your taste and adidas's overlap around Hip-Hop, which may make them worth exploring for a collaboration that feels native to the content you already make. Nothing here says adidas runs a creator programme, is looking for partners, or would respond.
Could not be judged: Your strongest cultural ground — Music, Film and Retro — found no counterpart in what the catalogue returned for this brand. That is a gap in the data held about the brand, not a finding that the brand has nothing to do with it.; Geographic fit — Exact country match between your declared location and the region the data source returned for this brand..
Cultural relevance is not commercial intent. A strong figure means adidas sits near your taste in the catalogue this data came from — it does not mean they sponsor creators, that a campaign exists, or that an introduction would land.
1 of 5 dimensions could not be computed and were excluded rather than assumed. The remaining weights were renormalised so the total still sums to 1 — they were not padded with a neutral value.
This is a partial assessment. 4 of 5 dimensions contributed, covering 90% of the intended weighting; the rest were renormalised into the ones that did. The figure is arithmetically correct over the available dimensions, but it is not a full assessment and should not be read as one.
Computed from 4 of 5 dimensions, covering 90% of the nominal weighting. Geographic fit was excluded because the data was not available — not set to a default.
No verified partnership route is on file for adidas. CreatorsDNA does not guess at contact details, and no route on file says nothing about whether one exists — only that we could not check it. If you pitch, you will be finding the contact yourself.
What the fit score is made of, and what could not be computed.
1 of 5 dimensions could not be computed and were excluded rather than assumed. The remaining weights were renormalised so the total still sums to 1 — they were not padded with a neutral value.
This is a partial assessment. 4 of 5 dimensions contributed, covering 90% of the intended weighting; the rest were renormalised into the ones that did. The figure is arithmetically correct over the available dimensions, but it is not a full assessment and should not be read as one.
MethodBrand fit is a weighted combination of up to five dimensions at 45/20/15/10/10. A dimension with no data is excluded and the remaining weights are renormalised — it is never given a default value.
Computed from 4 of 5 dimensions, covering 90% of the nominal weighting. Geographic fit was excluded because the data was not available — not set to a default.
Alignment is exploratory: the order above is the strength of that overlap, not a recommendation to sign with anyone. Partnership routes appear only where a verified one is on file — 0 of 12 brands in this run.
MethodBrand fit is a weighted combination of up to five dimensions at 45/20/15/10/10. A dimension with no data is excluded and the remaining weights are renormalised — it is never given a default value. Chains show interest → cultural affinity → brand; each link states whether the number came from the data source's explainability or from our own matching.